Topics

12/30/2025

Biological Responses Driving Weight Rebound After Weight Loss


<Summary>

When individuals lose weight through calorie restriction, adaptive responses involving coordinated changes in metabolism, neuroendocrine function, autonomic regulation, and behavior are triggered, ultimately promoting weight rebound. These responses may help explain why calorie-restricted diets frequently fail to produce lasting weight loss.

    
(1) Metabolic adaptation
Weight loss induced by calorie restriction leads to a significant reduction in resting energy expenditure beyond what would be predicted from changes in body composition. This metabolic adaptation occurs in both formerly obese individuals and naturally lean individuals who have lost weight, creating conditions that favor weight rebound.

    
(2) Endocrine function
A wide range of hormones secreted from the gastrointestinal tract and adipose tissue—such as leptin, ghrelin, peptide YY, and cholecystokinin—play essential roles in regulating appetite, food intake, and energy expenditure.
A calorie-restricted diet simultaneously decreases satiety and increases hunger, which can promote overeating.

    
(3) Food reward and addiction-like processes
When we eat palatable foods, neurotransmitters such as dopamine are released, activating reward-related neural circuits. The desire to experience this pleasure again motivates the next eating episode.
Calorie restriction and fasting can heighten the reward value of food, especially energy-dense, highly palatable foods.

     
(4) Inhibitory system and binge eating 
Short-term dieting success can be attributed to enhanced inhibitory neural responses that temporarily suppress the desire to eat. However, as dietary restrictions continue,
activation of reward-related brain regions may begin to override inhibitory control, making it increasingly difficult to resist cravings for palatable foods.

    
(5) Adipose cellularity
Weight loss reduces the size of adipocytes (fat cells), but their number generally remains unchanged. However, some researchers have pointed out that the possibility of new fat cells forming (hyperplasia) during weight rebound cannot be completely ruled out.
If hyperplasia does occur, these fat cells could enlarge again, potentially promoting further expansion of overall adipose tissue.

    
(6) Intestinal starvation
Unlike the situations described in (1)–(5), intestinal starvation does not arise from a marked deficiency in energy.

    
Conclusion
Some researchers argue that the biological forces driving weight rebound after weight loss are extremely powerful and difficult to overcome. In my opinion, rather than trying to fight these responses, it is more important to avoid triggering them strongly in the first place.

Specifically, instead of enduring prolonged hunger, it is helpful to consume more nutrient-dense, minimally processed foods while adjusting caloric intake. Doing so helps sustain satiety and reduce hunger—key factors in supporting long-term weight management.

【Full text】

Contents

  1. Multifaceted mechanisms that promote weight rebound
    (1)Metabolic adaptation
    (2) Endocrine Function
    (3) Food Reward and Addiction-Like Processes
    (4) Inhibitory system and binge eating
    (5) Adipose cellularity 
    (6) Intestinal starvation
  2. Conclusion

<Introduction>

The prescription for people with obesity to ”eat less and exercise more”remains a widely used approach to weight management, despite its well-documented failures[1]. It has been suggested that most of the weight lost through dieting is regained over the long term[2]

According to research in genetics, epidemiology, and physiology, body fat and body weight are known to be tightly regulated. When a person attempts to maintain weight loss, adaptive responses involving coordinated changes in metabolic, neuroendocrine, autonomic, and behavioral functions are triggered, acting to oppose the maintenance of the reduced weight[4].

In this post, I’d like to take a brief look at these biological mechanisms that may drive weight rebound and even promote further weight gain after dieting. I will also explain how my theory of intestinal starvation differs from these mechanisms.

【Related Articles】 The Spread of Dieting May Be Fueling the Rise in Obesity

               

1.Multifaceted mechanisms that promote weight rebound

(1) Metabolic adaptation

Energy restriction is associated with a reduction in resting energy expenditure (REE)[5].

Many studies have reported that behavioral weight loss leads to a greater decrease in both resting and total energy expenditure than would be predicted based on changes in body composition and the thermic effects of food[4,6].

This phenomenon, known as adaptive thermogenesis (AT) or metabolic adaptation, creates conditions that favor regaining lost weight[7]

Metabolic adaptation can be interpreted teleologically as the body's survival response: when the body perceives a state of starvation, it reduces the energy costs of living in an attempt to prolong life. Interestingly, this response also appears to occur in individuals with obesity and does not seem to be diminished by the quantity of energy stored as body fat[7,8].

Decrease in basal metabolic rate

(Author: rawpixel.com / Source: Freepik)

However, regarding the timing of its onset, there is inconsistent evidence[9]. Some studies have detected adaptive thermogenesis (AT) within a week of energy restriction, which has been associated with rapid declines in insulin secretion, depletion of glycogen stores, and loss of intra-and extra cellular fluid[10].

In contrast, a growing body of evidence suggests that underfeeding-associated AT takes weeks to develop[11], primarily in association with reduced leptin secretion resulting from the reduction of stored fat[9,12]

Although the persistence of AT also remains a subject of debate[7], some studies indicate that this metabolic adaptation may continue for years even after energy balance has been reestablished at a lower weight[13]


(2) Endocrine function

A number of hormones secreted from the gastrointestinal tract and adipose tissue are known to play key roles in regulating appetite, food intake, energy expenditure, and body weight[14,15].

Leptin is a hormone secreted by fat cells that helps regulate body weight by suppressing appetite through stimulation of the satiety center and by increasing energy expenditure. High leptin levels are interpreted by the brain that energy reserves are high, whereas low leptin levels indicate that energy reserves are low[16].

 It has been shown that leptin levels drop within 24 hours of energy restriction[17]. Interestingly, many studies have reported a greater reduction in leptin levels than would be expected for given losses of adipose tissue[18,19]

It has been suggested that the primary role of leptin may be the prevention of starvation, rather than weight regulation per se[15,20]. When leptin levels fall below a certain threshold—the point at which specific physiological responses are triggered(*1)—starvation defense mechanisms are activated, even if substantial fat stores remain[17]. This leads to a reduction in metabolic rate and physical activity, as well as an increase in hunger[21,22].

(* 1) It has been suggested that this threshold rises as fat mass increases[17].


Furthermore, in individuals who have lost weight, an increase in the appetite-stimulating hormone ghrelin, along with decreases in the post-meal satiety signals peptide YY (PYY) and cholecystokinin (CCK), has been observed[23].

As a result, behavioral weight loss can simultaneously induce a decrease in satiety and an increase in hunger, potentially promoting overeating[15].


(3) Food reward and addiction-like processes

Food reward refers to the brain’s mechanism that generates pleasure and satisfaction from eating, as well as the motivation or desire to eat again. This process involves activation of the brain’s reward circuitry, where neurotransmitters such as dopamine are released, leading to feelings of well-being and increased appetite.

Food reward,dopamine

(Author: rawpixel.com / Source: Freepik)

The regulation of food intake is influenced by a close interaction between homeostatic and non-homeostatic (hedonic) factors.

The former is related to nutritional needs, monitoring available energy in the blood and fat stores to maintain energy balance. The latter, in contrast, is largely associated with the brain’s reward system[24,25].

Although the mechanisms that determine how much we eat are largely homeostatic, reward-related signals can easily override these normal satiety signals that help maintain a stable body weight, potentially leading to overeating[25,26].

Modern neuroimaging studies using fMRI have shown that both nutritional status (e.g., hunger vs. satiety) and different food stimuli (e.g., high vs. low calorie, appetizing vs. bland foods) can alter activity in the brain’s reward circuitry[27,28,29].

Recent studies in healthy individuals indicate that short-or long-term caloric restriction, as well as fasting, may increase the reward value of food—especially for high-calorie, palatable items[27,30]

These findings may help explain why calorie-restricted diets for weight loss often fail in the long term[28,30].

<Food Addiction and Its Differences from Drug Addiction>

While drugs and food share certain characteristics, they also differ in qualitative and quantitative ways.

Drugs of abuse, such as cocaine, act directly on the brain’s dopamine circuitry, whereas food influences the same circuits more indirectly. Signals from taste and smell, nutrient sensors in the digestive tract[31], and hormones released during digestion and absorption of ingested food all communicate with the brain and activate the dopamine system[25].

Addiction-like processes

Although it remains debated whether specific food components such as sugar, sweeteners, salt, or fat can prompt addictive processes[25], highly palatable and calorie-dense foods—such as chocolate, ice cream, cookies, and salty snacks—can serve as powerful rewards.

In today’s stress-filled society, these foods provide pleasure and comfort, leading some researchers to draw parallels between “food addiction” and drug addiction[32,33]


(4) Inhibitory system and binge eating

Food intake is primarily regulated by three interactive neural systems: the homeostatic, reward-related, and inhibitory systems[15].

The inhibitory system—mainly involving the brain region responsible for self-control and decision-making—helps regulate eating behavior and inhibit excess food intake[34].

<Cognitive control of food reward>

In humans, the urge to seek and consume palatable foods can be moderated by cognition, specifically  executive functions. One of the central dilemmas in daily life is balancing one’s internal goals (e.g., cutting back on sweets to maintain health and weight control) against the immediate reward of eating tempting foods. This conflict is particularly challenging when highly desirable foods, like donuts or pizza, are readily available[25].

Binge eating

(Source: Freepik)

The short-term success in dieting suggests that an increase in inhibitory neural responses can temporarily override the neurobiological drive to consume highly palatable high-calorie foods[35].

However, recent evidence indicates that reward-related neural signaling is activated in conjunction with inhibitory signaling[36].

In simple terms, as dietary restriction continues, it may become increasingly difficult to resist the urge to eat appetizing, high-reward foods.

Prospective studies in young individuals, as well as animal experiments in rodents, suggest that severe caloric restriction, characterized by 24-hour fasting or fat-free diets, may increase the risk of developing binge eating and bulimia in the future[37,38].
      

(5) Adipose cellularity

Weight loss dieting may reduce the size but not the number of fat cells[39]. It remains unclear whether hyperplasia (an increase in adipocyte number) contributes to weight rebound in weight-suppressed individuals[15]. However, in a study with obese rats, adipocyte hyperplasia has been observed following refeeding after fasting[40].

In humans, a similar possibility has been suggested[15].

Normally, when energy availability is low, triglycerides stored in fat tissue are broken down to supply energy to cells.

However, the rate of lipolysis (fat breakdown) appears to be related to adipocyte size and cellular surface area[41]—meaning that as fat cells shrink, their rate of lipolysis tends to decline.

If size-reduced adipocytes are functionally modified to break down less and store more fat, these cells may become enlarged, potentially promoting the overall expansion of adipose tissue[15,42].

An increase in body fat

(Author: brgfx / Source: Freepik)

(6) Intestinal starvation

The reactions described in section 1 to 5 are thought to represent a series of anti-starvation or anti-weight loss mechanisms(* 2) triggered by glycogen depletion or a significant decrease in stored body fat[15].

In contrast, intestinal starvation does not result from a depletion of energy. While it can occur under strict dietary restrictions aimed at weight loss—such as skipping meals or eating only very small portions—it may also be triggered by more casual dieting, or lifestyle habits not directly related to dieting, such as skipping breakfast, eating light lunches, having late dinners, or eating two meals a day.
【Related article】
Defining "Intestinal Starvation": Its Relevance to the Multifactorial Model of Obesity


I also believe that when intestinal starvation is induced, it leads to overall weight gain, suggesting an increase in body’s set-point weight. This increase likely involves not only body fat but also lean tissue such as muscle mass. Therefore, it may differ from weight gain mechanisms characterized by abnormal increases in abdominal and total body fat.

(* 2) Some researchers prefer the term "anti-weight loss" mechanism rather than anti-starvation, because these responses operate despite the presence of adequate energy stores[15].

2. Conclusion

Although a direct causal relationship between the five mechanisms (section 1-5) discussed here and weight rebound has not yet been proven[15], many people who have experienced rebounding after dieting may find these explanations relatable.

Some researchers point out that “the biological forces resisting weight loss and driving weight rebound are so powerful that most individuals attempting to lose weight through behavioral interventions are unlikely to overcome them.” At the same time, they emphasize the need to develop new strategies that can weaken these biological mechanisms in order to achieve long-term weight loss[15].


In my opinion, rather than trying to overcome these powerful biological forces, what’s truly important is to avoid triggering the anti-starvation (or anti-weight loss) mechanisms in the first place.

Currently, obesity is widely believed to result from excess caloric intake and/or lack of physical activity. Consequently, the common advice is to “eat less and exercise more.” However, many people try to reduce calories by eating light meals or very small portions (e.g., a simple sandwich, a simple burger) and endure extended periods of hunger. As the findings on food reward and inhibitory systems indicate, this approach clearly ignores the body’s natural biological mechanisms.

I would rather recommend the following approach:

    
• Mainly reduce refined carbohydrates and adjust total caloric intake—but avoid extreme restrictions.

• Increase other foods, such as fiber-rich vegetables, seaweed, dairy products, minimally processed meats and fish, and nuts. In particular, emphasize foods that are harder to digest or take longer to break down (* 2).
(* 2) Even high-calorie foods like oils and nuts can be appropriate depending on how they’re consumed.

            

By maintaining this dietary approach, the signal that "there is sufficient food available" may be transmitted through the gut-brain axis. Sustaining satiety and reducing hunger is key.

Moreover, nutrient-sensing systems in the digestive tract and other parts of the body have also been indicated to contribute to the generation of food reward during and after a meal[43]. By chewing slowly and savoring each bite, you can gain not only the immediate reward from taste buds but also a longer-lasting sense of satisfaction that extends well beyond the end of the meal[44].

The current obesity epidemic is often described as a mismatch between our modern, food-abundant environment and biological response patterns that evolved under food-scarce conditions[44,45]

From this perspective, I believe that in an environment where palatable food is readily available, even extended periods of hunger in daily life may actually promote long-term increases in body fat depending on how we combine foods.
              

<References>
[1] Bacon L, Aphramor L. Weight science: evaluating the evidence for a paradigm shift. Nutr J. 2011 Jan 24;10:9. 

[2]National Institutes of Health Technology Assessment Conference Panel (1993) Methods for voluntary weight loss and control. Ann Intern Med 119, 764–770.

[3] Deleted

[4] Rosenbaum M, Leibel RL. Adaptive thermogenesis in humans. Int J Obes (Lond). 2010 Oct;34 Suppl 1(0 1):S47-55. 

[5]Jiménez Jaime T et al. Effect of calorie restriction on energy expenditure in overweight and obese adult women. Nutr Hosp. 2015 Jun 1;31(6):2428-36. 

[6]Johannsen DL et al. Metabolic slowing with massive weight loss despite preservation of fat-free mass. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Jul;97(7):2489-96. 

[7]Hall KD, Guo J. Obesity Energetics: Body Weight Regulation and the Effects of Diet Composition. Gastroenterology. 2017 May;152(7):1718-1727.e3. 

[8]Leibel RL, Rosenbaum M, Hirsch J. Changes in energy expenditure resulting from altered body weight. N Engl J Med. 1995 Mar 9;332(10):621-8. 

[9]Egan AM, Collins AL. Dynamic changes in energy expenditure in response to underfeeding: a review. Proc Nutr Soc. 2022 May;81(2):199-212. 

[10]Heinitz S et al. Early adaptive thermogenesis is a determinant of weight loss after six weeks of caloric restriction in overweight subjects. Metabolism. 2020 Sep;110:154303. 

[11] Dulloo AG, Seydoux J, Jacquet J. Adaptive thermogenesis and uncoupling proteins: a reappraisal of their roles in fat metabolism and energy balance. Physiol Behav. 2004 Dec 30;83(4):587-602. 

[12]Müller MJ, Enderle J, Bosy-Westphal A. Changes in Energy Expenditure with Weight Gain and Weight Loss in Humans. Curr Obes Rep. 2016 Dec;5(4):413-423. 

[13]Fothergill E et al. Persistent metabolic adaptation 6 years after "The Biggest Loser" competition. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Aug;24(8):1612-9. 

[14]Schwartz MW et al. Central nervous system control of food intake. Nature. 2000 Apr 6;404(6778):661-71. 

[15]Ochner CN et al. Biological mechanisms that promote weight regain following weight loss in obese humans. Physiol Behav. 2013 Aug 15;120:106-13. 

[16]Hebebrand J et al. The role of hypoleptinemia in the psychological and behavioral adaptation to starvation: Implications for anorexia nervosa. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Oct;141:104807. 

[17]Leibel RL. The role of leptin in the control of body weight. Nutr Rev. 2002 Oct;60(10 Pt 2):S15-9; discussion S68-84, 85-7. 

[18]Löfgren P et al. Long-term prospective and controlled studies demonstrate adipose tissue hypercellularity and relative leptin deficiency in the postobese state. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Nov;90(11):6207-13. 

[19]Rosenbaum M et al. Effects of weight change on plasma leptin concentrations and energy expenditure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997 Nov;82(11):3647-54. 

[20]Ahima RS et al. Role of leptin in the neuroendocrine response to fasting. Nature. 1996 Jul 18;382(6588):250-2. 

[21] Rosenbaum M et al. Energy intake in weight-reduced humans. Brain Res. 2010 Sep 2;1350:95-102. 

[22]Kissileff HR et al. Leptin reverses declines in satiation in weight-reduced obese humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Feb;95(2):309-17. 

[23] Sumithran P et al. Long-term persistence of hormonal adaptations to weight loss. N Engl J Med. 2011 Oct 27;365(17):1597-604. 

[24]Chaptini L, Peikin S. Neuroendocrine regulation of food intake. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2008 Mar;24(2):223-9. 

[25]Alonso-Alonso M et al. Food reward system: current perspectives and future research needs. Nutr Rev. 2015 May;73(5):296-307. 

[26]Begg DP, Woods SC. The endocrinology of food intake. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2013 Oct;9(10):584-97. 

[27]Goldstone AP et al. Fasting biases brain reward systems towards high-calorie foods. Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Oct;30(8):1625-35. 

[28]Siep N et al. Hunger is the best spice: an fMRI study of the effects of attention, hunger and calorie content on food reward processing in the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex. Behav Brain Res. 2009 Mar 2;198(1):149-58. 

[29]Haase L, Cerf-Ducastel B, Murphy C. Cortical activation in response to pure taste stimuli during the physiological states of hunger and satiety. Neuroimage. 2009 Feb 1;44(3):1008-21. 

[30] Stice E, Burger K, Yokum S. Caloric deprivation increases responsivity of attention and reward brain regions to intake, anticipated intake, and images of palatable foods. Neuroimage. 2013 Feb 15;67:322-30. 

[31] de Araujo IE et al. Food reward in the absence of taste receptor signaling. Neuron. 2008 Mar 27;57(6):930-41. 

[32]Avena NM, Rada P, Hoebel BG. Sugar and fat bingeing have notable differences in addictive-like behavior. J Nutr. 2009 Mar;139(3):623-8. 

[33]Berthoud HR, Zheng H, Shin AC. Food reward in the obese and after weight loss induced by calorie restriction and bariatric surgery. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012 Aug;1264(1):36-48. 

[34]Pannacciulli N et al. Less activation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in response to a meal: a feature of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Oct;84(4):725-31. 

[35]DelParigi A et al. Successful dieters have increased neural activity in cortical areas involved in the control of behavior. Int J Obes (Lond). 2007 Mar;31(3):440-8. 

[36]Burger KS, Stice E. Relation of dietary restraint scores to activation of reward-related brain regions in response to food intake, anticipated intake, and food pictures. Neuroimage. 2011 Mar 1;55(1):233-9. 

[37]Stice E, Davis K, Miller NP, Marti CN. Fasting increases risk for onset of binge eating and bulimic pathology: a 5-year prospective study. J Abnorm Psychol. 2008 Nov;117(4):941-6. 

[38]Ogawa R et al. Chronic food restriction and reduced dietary fat: risk factors for bouts of overeating. Physiol Behav. 2005 Nov 15;86(4):578-85. 

[39]Gurr MI et al. Adipose tissue cellularity in man: the relationship between fat cell size and number, the mass and distribution of body fat and the history of weight gain and loss. Int J Obes. 1982;6(5):419-36. PMID: 7174187.

[40]Yang MU, Presta E, Björntorp P. Refeeding after fasting in rats: effects of duration of starvation and refeeding on food efficiency in diet-induced obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990 Jun;51(6):970-8. 

[41]Arner P. Control of lipolysis and its relevance to development of obesity in man. Diabetes Metab Rev. 1988 Aug;4(5):507-15. PMID: 3061758.

[42]MacLean PS et al. Peripheral metabolic responses to prolonged weight reduction that promote rapid, efficient regain in obesity-prone rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2006 Jun;290(6):R1577-88. 

[43]Sclafani A, Ackroff K. The relationship between food reward and satiation revisited. Physiol Behav. 2004 Aug;82(1):89-95. 

[44]Berthoud HR, Lenard NR, Shin AC. Food reward, hyperphagia, and obesity. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2011 Jun;300(6):R1266-77. 

[45]Speakman JR. Thrifty genes for obesity, an attractive but flawed idea, and an alternative perspective: the 'drifty gene' hypothesis. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Nov;32(11):1611-7.